Research domains
This can mostly be applied to funding or project proposals where a detailed methodology is being presented.
Context and considerations
In this idea, the details of the methodology and research process take precedence over the outputs and promised deliverables. Funders can incite applicants to reflect on specific aspects of the methodology of the project. For example, they can ask researchers to include:
- a statement and strategy towards sex and gender of participants included in the research (see NIHR sex and gender in research policy)
- a living data management plan (DMP) to be submitted alongside the application
- a statement on open research methodologies and principles followed by the project
- a statement on research integrity indicators and elements included to foster integrity (e.g., pre-registration, plan for publication of negative results, etc.)
- a data provenance review process
- an EDI action plan (see related idea)
Funders may wish to monitor, for example in mid term review, whether these elements have been followed. The mid-term review process could also include a research culture and integrity discussion with the investigatore. Note: The latter currently happens mostly during the assessment process.
Challenges and mitigations
Evaluating success
Relevant resources and literature
This section includes resources, literature, and reports relevant to this specific experimental idea.
Templates from funders and institutions
Case examples and literature
The Swedish Research Council asks applicants to consider sex and gender dimensions in their research, providing guidance to support applicants in this matter.