Application burden proportional to money/reward

Modifying the length and complexity of the application process based on the funding volume/award/result of the process can help reduce application burden. For larger grants/more senior positions, a more intense application process may be justified, but for small grants/short term applications, a light application process is preferable. This will reduce the burden for applicants, evaluators, and the organisations in charge of the assessment.
Level 0
Aim: Value process
Aim: Alternative questions
CoARA Commitment 6
Target: Funder
Target: Academic institution
Target: Scholarly association
Contributor

Experiments in Assessment WG

Publication date

April 9, 2026

Updated

April 20, 2026

WarningObjectives and potential outcome

This idea aims to reduce the application burden that happens for applicants, reviewers, and organisations, wherever possible.
- Reduce unnecessary burden for small application processes
- Make more efficient use of research time and resources
- Less time/resources spent on small research assessment can increase assessment capacity and indirectly increase assessment quality where it is really needed

Research domains

This idea is relevant to research funders in particular, but it may be relevant to any type of assessment and application processes. These may include hiring and promotion processes, awards submission processes, funding or fellowship applications, etc.

Context and considerations

Application processes take time and resources, regardless of the outcome. In fact, several studies have shown that the costs of application to grant proposal is non negligible, and that their costs can even exceed the awarded funding that is redistributed in research (see Herbert et al., (2013); Gross and Bergstrom (2019); Schweiger (2025)).

While the calculation of funding value is complex and funding investments in research are believed to build value at much higher rates than initial investments (see Stafford (2026)), building application processes with a burden proportional to the success value would help shape more efficient assessment processes, enabling to free up time and resources for high quality assessment processes.

Challenges and mitigations

Evaluating success

Relevant resources and literature

This section includes resources, literature, and reports relevant to this specific experimental idea.

Templates from funders and institutions

Case examples and literature

Other resources

Fackrell K, Church H, Crane K, et al Online survey exploring researcher experiences of research funding processes in the UK: the effort and burden of applying for funding and fulfilling reporting requirements BMJ Open 2024;14:e079581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079581

Case Studies or Implementation Examples